Trump Attacks Supreme Court Justices He Appointed.
The Supreme Court denied the Trump administration's emergency request to enforce new mail-in ballot rules before the midterms. Trump responded Tuesday with a lengthy Truth Social post attacking the justices he appointed.
- 7-2: the vote denying the administration's emergency request.
- Justices Alito and Thomas were the only two dissenters.
- Justices Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett — all Trump appointees — joined the majority.
- Kavanaugh wrote separately: insufficient time made enforcement arbitrary under federal law.
Why it matters: The blocked rule would have required states to adopt standardized ballot envelopes and use an untested USPS voter-eligibility portal on a tight pre-election deadline.
- Election officials argued the timeline was unworkable and the rule gave the Postal Service unconstitutional authority over election administration.
- The injunction covers only elections on or before November 3, 2026; the underlying litigation continues.
How 48 sources split on this story
Where they split: The core dispute is whether the USPS rule was a legitimate election-integrity measure or an unworkable federal overreach into state-run elections.
Center coverage, 12 sources: The center frames the episode as another legal setback for Trump's voting restrictions, noting the Court left open a path for future implementation.
Newsweek16hTimeline shows Trump's criticism of his own Supreme Court justices
PBS NewsHour16hWATCH: Blanche justifies Trump bashing Supreme Court over mail ballots: 'He is very frustrated'YNYahoo News22hIn controversial mail-in ballot ruling, Trump has only two Supreme Court allies
Axios23hTrump turns on the Supreme Court he helped build
Forbes22hTrump Rips Supreme Court For Blocking USPS Ballot Rule: ‘These Are Not The People I Interviewed’IBTIBTimes17hTrump Slams Supreme Court Over Mail Ballot Decision, Calls Ruling a 'Disaster' for AmericaKSAKSAT 12 San Antonio23hTrump slams the Supreme Court for rejecting his push to restrict mail ballotsPenPennLive22hTrump makes stunning U-turn on his own Supreme Court picks: ‘Not the people I interviewed’
The Hill22hTrump rips justices on mail-in ballots: ‘These are not the people I interviewed to serve’TNDThe National Desk22hTrump rips his own Supreme Court picks after mail-in voting lossWNCWFLA News Channel 821hTrump rips justices on mail-in ballots: 'These are not the people I interviewed to serve'Left coverage, 16 sources: The left frames Trump's attack as an assault on judicial independence by a president who lost a legitimate check on executive overreach into elections.
The Independent22hTrump lashes out at Supreme Court over ‘shockingly bad’ mail ballot decision
AlterNet18hEx-staffer reveals Trump’s 'extreme measures' after bruising new defeat
Mediaite15hReporter Bluntly Asks Todd Blanche If Trump Is ‘Undermining’ Supreme Court After Latest Attack
CNN5hThe Supreme Court’s cryptic mail ballot decision won’t be its last word on voting
HuffPost1dJustices Alito, Thomas Dismiss Impacts Of Trump’s Mail Voting Overhaul Attempt In Dissent
MSNBC18hWhat Trump lauding Thomas and Alito as ‘legends’ means for the Supreme Court’s future
Raw Story11hTrump's 'pathetic' tantrum over Supreme Court backs him into 'awkward' corner: author
ABC News20hTrump slams the Supreme Court for rejecting his push to restrict mail ballotsCleCleveland.com22hTrump makes stunning U-turn on his own Supreme Court picks: ‘Not the people I interviewed’DKDaily Kos17hTrump is furious the Supreme Court is doing its jobMMMedia Matters21hCleta Mitchell on SCOTUS blocking Trump's mail-in ballot order: "I don't see that there's anything that can be done on a broad scale before this election, unfortunately"
Politico22hTrump lashes out at Supreme Court after mail ballot lossRight coverage, 20 sources: The right frames the ruling as a Republican loss that leaves mail-in voting vulnerable to fraud, with Trump's anger at his own appointees treated as understandable frustration.
RedState7hEssex Files: Supreme Court's Conservative Majority Needs to Stop Hesitating on Election Integrity
Washington Examiner15hBlanche says Trump has 'every right' to express frustration with Supreme Court
One America News21hTrump responds to SCOTUS ruling blocking admin's attempts to enforce new safeguards on mail-in voting
Reason16hTrump again condemns his Supreme Court nominees as too cowardly to agree with him
Breitbart News20hTrump Criticizes SCOTUS for Rejecting Safeguards to Mail-In Ballots
Conservative Treehouse20hPresident Trump Expresses Frustration with Supreme Court Ruling on USPS Mail-In Ballot Process - The Last Refuge
Daily Mail22hTrump unleashes fury on Supreme Court he built as he fumes they 'set America back a hundred years' after voting defeat
Fox News21hTrump blasts Supreme Court 'disaster' after justices rule against him on mail-in voting
New York Post22hTrump rips own Supreme Court picks after justices block mail-in ballot rules: 'These are not the people I interviewed'
NewsBusters17h'The View' Still Insists Trump Stole 2016, Has New Respect for SCOTUS
Newsmax22hTrump: 'Horrible' Supreme Court Ruling 'Big Loss' for US
PJ Media1dThe 'Partisan' and 'Pro-Trump' Supreme Court Just Dealt the President a Massive BlowWhat’s next: Attorney General Todd Blanche was set to brief reporters Tuesday afternoon.
- Lower courts continue hearing the rule's merits; Supreme Court review remains possible before 2028.
- Will Trump move to pressure Congress or use other executive tools to change mail-in voting rules before November?
- How will the public break with justices he appointed affect the Court's standing and future rulings involving the administration?